<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My turn: Web 3.0 will NEVER happen</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/</link>
	<description>My opinions about convergence, consumer technology, gadgets, Web, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:51:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sachin Mittal</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-195500</link>
		<dc:creator>Sachin Mittal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 20:59:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/#comment-195500</guid>
		<description>web 3.0 would definitely make waves.
as pc getting more powerful with faster cpu and more ram, the line between pc and a server would continue to narrow.
broadband would be ubiquitous.
browsers would be enhanced so can serve as a mini servers and be intelligent to process lot of content.
browsers would interact with other browsers directly using p2p protocols, giving users unique browsing experience.

they whole web concept would change, semantics would be built every where, with the intention of attracting browsers rather than users and users solely relying on browsers to serve them whole content automatically without having users do lot many things.

As am typing my project report on my favorite author, my browser is surfing across wikipedia and blogs to show me key information about that person one a side screen, same time amazon is displaying ads about his books to by just below that.

no more adsense and adwords where i get the ad only is a particular site has registered for this service or not. Reach the browsers directly without and middle man partner sites.

welcome to the new world.

Sachin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>web 3.0 would definitely make waves.<br />
as pc getting more powerful with faster cpu and more ram, the line between pc and a server would continue to narrow.<br />
broadband would be ubiquitous.<br />
browsers would be enhanced so can serve as a mini servers and be intelligent to process lot of content.<br />
browsers would interact with other browsers directly using p2p protocols, giving users unique browsing experience.</p>
<p>they whole web concept would change, semantics would be built every where, with the intention of attracting browsers rather than users and users solely relying on browsers to serve them whole content automatically without having users do lot many things.</p>
<p>As am typing my project report on my favorite author, my browser is surfing across wikipedia and blogs to show me key information about that person one a side screen, same time amazon is displaying ads about his books to by just below that.</p>
<p>no more adsense and adwords where i get the ad only is a particular site has registered for this service or not. Reach the browsers directly without and middle man partner sites.</p>
<p>welcome to the new world.</p>
<p>Sachin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Cohen</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-194037</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Cohen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Oct 2007 16:18:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/#comment-194037</guid>
		<description>Web 2.0 was valid only because of the dark days of 2001-2003, when people thought the Internet is dead. There was a clear period gap in Silicon Valley between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. I totally agree that the term Web 3.0 will never catch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Web 2.0 was valid only because of the dark days of 2001-2003, when people thought the Internet is dead. There was a clear period gap in Silicon Valley between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0. I totally agree that the term Web 3.0 will never catch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Zatz</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-192177</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Zatz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/#comment-192177</guid>
		<description>&quot;the next article, will be the Tivo hosting Rhapsody music service.&quot;

I hope not... I didn&#039;t even both staying up late last night to wait for the screengrabs and post when the embargo lifted at midnight EST.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;the next article, will be the Tivo hosting Rhapsody music service.&#8221;</p>
<p>I hope not&#8230; I didn&#8217;t even both staying up late last night to wait for the screengrabs and post when the embargo lifted at midnight EST.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lewis</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-192168</link>
		<dc:creator>Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:01:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/#comment-192168</guid>
		<description>Nah, the next one will be on Google buying Jaiku.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah, the next one will be on Google buying Jaiku.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ShinyRed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What comes after 2?</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-192167</link>
		<dc:creator>ShinyRed &#187; Blog Archive &#187; What comes after 2?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 16:59:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/#comment-192167</guid>
		<description>[...] Jemima Kiss suggesting the world isn&#8217;t quite in touch with 2.0 yet, and digital media guru Jeremy Toeman arguing that the next big wave for the web is all about access, Calcanis has certainly struck a [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Jemima Kiss suggesting the world isn&#8217;t quite in touch with 2.0 yet, and digital media guru Jeremy Toeman arguing that the next big wave for the web is all about access, Calcanis has certainly struck a [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tivoboy</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-192113</link>
		<dc:creator>tivoboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 14:13:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/#comment-192113</guid>
		<description>wait for it, wait for it!
the next article, will be the Tivo hosting Rhapsody music service.  

I&#039;m waiting</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wait for it, wait for it!<br />
the next article, will be the Tivo hosting Rhapsody music service.  </p>
<p>I&#8217;m waiting</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff K</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-190016</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff K</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 23:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/#comment-190016</guid>
		<description>Feh! Too many pundits and experts, so little time. :-) 

I think the problem we have is that everyone is trying to label current technologies and business trends while they are taking place rather than letting history sort that out.  Why do we spend so much energy on what the meaning of &quot;web 2.0&quot; or  &quot;web 3.0&quot;?   Who cares really?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Feh! Too many pundits and experts, so little time. <img src='http://www.livedigitally.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' />  </p>
<p>I think the problem we have is that everyone is trying to label current technologies and business trends while they are taking place rather than letting history sort that out.  Why do we spend so much energy on what the meaning of &#8220;web 2.0&#8243; or  &#8220;web 3.0&#8243;?   Who cares really?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Calacanis: Web 3.0 is whatever I say it is - - mathewingram.com/work</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/comment-page-1/#comment-189967</link>
		<dc:creator>Calacanis: Web 3.0 is whatever I say it is - - mathewingram.com/work</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 19:41:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/2007/10/04/my-turn-web-30-will-never-happen/#comment-189967</guid>
		<description>[...] on what Web 3.0 is at Bubblicious, and so do Alex Iskold at Adaptive Blue, Jeremy Toeman at LiveDigitally, Allan Stern at CenterNetworks, Ross Dawson and Eric Berlin at Online Media Cultist. Tags: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] on what Web 3.0 is at Bubblicious, and so do Alex Iskold at Adaptive Blue, Jeremy Toeman at LiveDigitally, Allan Stern at CenterNetworks, Ross Dawson and Eric Berlin at Online Media Cultist. Tags: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

