<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Time for a new digital camera</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/08/19/time-for-a-new-digital-camera/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/08/19/time-for-a-new-digital-camera/</link>
	<description>Reviews and opinions about consumer technology, gadgets, Websites, new media, services, and more.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/08/19/time-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-47303</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Aug 2006 13:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/08/19/time-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-47303</guid>
		<description>Hey Jeremy, you might like the shirt that Robert Scoble was wearing when we did a shoot last night down at the Golden Gate Bridge in SF.

http://beta.zooomr.com/smartsets/thomashawk/1913</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jeremy, you might like the shirt that Robert Scoble was wearing when we did a shoot last night down at the Golden Gate Bridge in SF.</p>
<p><a href="http://beta.zooomr.com/smartsets/thomashawk/1913" rel="nofollow">http://beta.zooomr.com/smartsets/thomashawk/1913</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tivoboy</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/08/19/time-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-46696</link>
		<dc:creator>tivoboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:36:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/08/19/time-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-46696</guid>
		<description>was that party up at Quadrus?  I saw some of the august boys.
and you were 30 seconds from my house!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>was that party up at Quadrus?  I saw some of the august boys.<br />
and you were 30 seconds from my house!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tivoboy</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/08/19/time-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-46693</link>
		<dc:creator>tivoboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 15:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/08/19/time-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-46693</guid>
		<description>yes, the sd700is is very good.  I have had the sd450, sd550, bought the 630 took it back and got the sd700.  I read all the dpreview reviews, and actually thought I wouldn't like it, but I do.  I don't find any of the corner softness areas that some have posted about.  Maybe I just got a good copy.  the IS is nice, and the ISO performance is decent.  Only decent, above ISO 400, I wouldn't shoot with it.

You should be able to pick one up for about 370$ shipped, they have come down in the past two months.

when you go SLR, I would still go canon.  The high ISO performance just rocks, but camera bodies and lenses are one of the most subjective decsions out there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes, the sd700is is very good.  I have had the sd450, sd550, bought the 630 took it back and got the sd700.  I read all the dpreview reviews, and actually thought I wouldn&#8217;t like it, but I do.  I don&#8217;t find any of the corner softness areas that some have posted about.  Maybe I just got a good copy.  the IS is nice, and the ISO performance is decent.  Only decent, above ISO 400, I wouldn&#8217;t shoot with it.</p>
<p>You should be able to pick one up for about 370$ shipped, they have come down in the past two months.</p>
<p>when you go SLR, I would still go canon.  The high ISO performance just rocks, but camera bodies and lenses are one of the most subjective decsions out there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Hawk</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/08/19/time-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-46555</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Hawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Aug 2006 04:55:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/08/19/time-for-a-new-digital-camera/#comment-46555</guid>
		<description>Hey Jeremy, good meeting you last night.  I don't think you'll go wrong with a Canon, but for point and shoots you might want to check out the Fuji's as well.  They actually have some pretty good color technology in my opinon of course.

Of course the real jump up would be to a DSLR and then you either go Canon or Nikon but that's a bigger investment and it's a rare bird (odd ducks like me) who like to carry those big beasts around.

I'll have to try and figure the Slingbox thing out again at some point.  Let me know when you guys have one that will allow my Cat6 cable to go in and then another to go out to hook back into the Media Center PC in my living room that I need internet access for.

Best,

Tom</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Jeremy, good meeting you last night.  I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll go wrong with a Canon, but for point and shoots you might want to check out the Fuji&#8217;s as well.  They actually have some pretty good color technology in my opinon of course.</p>
<p>Of course the real jump up would be to a DSLR and then you either go Canon or Nikon but that&#8217;s a bigger investment and it&#8217;s a rare bird (odd ducks like me) who like to carry those big beasts around.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll have to try and figure the Slingbox thing out again at some point.  Let me know when you guys have one that will allow my Cat6 cable to go in and then another to go out to hook back into the Media Center PC in my living room that I need internet access for.</p>
<p>Best,</p>
<p>Tom</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
