<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Demystifying some HDTV technology</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/07/12/demystifying-some-hdtv-technology/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/07/12/demystifying-some-hdtv-technology/</link>
	<description>My opinions about convergence, consumer technology, gadgets, Web, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 09:51:18 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/07/12/demystifying-some-hdtv-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-39649</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 16:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/?p=927#comment-39649</guid>
		<description>Awesome article. I think I learned!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome article. I think I learned!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tivoboy</title>
		<link>http://www.livedigitally.com/2006/07/12/demystifying-some-hdtv-technology/comment-page-1/#comment-39646</link>
		<dc:creator>tivoboy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 15:40:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.livedigitally.com/?p=927#comment-39646</guid>
		<description>Nice post!

Yes, HDCP BAD!
cheap radio shack UHV/VHF antenna for getting OTA signals GOOD!

It continues to amaze me that the same old (don&#039;t be fooled into buying ANY expensive UHF/VHF antenna that says HDTV READY, or MADE FOR HDTV) antennas that we have used for YEARS are capable of giving us the 10-20MB of OTA HD goodness that makes the HDTV sets really shine.  I haven&#039;t seen ANY Satellite or Cable content and that includes the old DISCOVERY HD before it was compressed, that matches what the OTA antennas will give you in image quality.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice post!</p>
<p>Yes, HDCP BAD!<br />
cheap radio shack UHV/VHF antenna for getting OTA signals GOOD!</p>
<p>It continues to amaze me that the same old (don&#8217;t be fooled into buying ANY expensive UHF/VHF antenna that says HDTV READY, or MADE FOR HDTV) antennas that we have used for YEARS are capable of giving us the 10-20MB of OTA HD goodness that makes the HDTV sets really shine.  I haven&#8217;t seen ANY Satellite or Cable content and that includes the old DISCOVERY HD before it was compressed, that matches what the OTA antennas will give you in image quality.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

